Second Life Response Questions for Art and Tech

1.   Do you think SL is educational?

The educational aspect of second life is submerged or even hidden beneath the layer of distractions that are presented to you in such an un-realistic environment. The amount of options one has is unlimited. It is easier to get caught up in the social environment than the learning one. Second life could be used as an education tool as long as the education is goal driven. One could gather information in so many different forms that the line between educational and just interactive can be blurred. Educational information can come from visiting certain areas and sitting in on information sessions, or just by happening to start a conversation with the right person. Newer users may hesitate or take longer to pin point these educational situations or places, because of the infinite other options that are presented to them.

2.    What did you do there? What was something you realized?

I tried visiting many destinations but could not find any highly populated destinations. Places like New York City and San Diego seemed almost desolate. People I would try to have a conversation with would just walk away. I realized that once I found any populated areas, that people were more interested in the environment (party environment) than talking to me. The areas with the most people I found were at X rated areas like “nude island”. 

3.    Is this experience an alternative to real life for you?

No. The lack of physical human interaction, or the beauty lost in the virtual quality of the "second life" does not intrigue me personally. 

4.    What differences do you see in SL and your real life?

Second life allows you to detach whom you are and who you want to be seen as. Besides physical appearance, your location and response to the environment can allow you to create a entirely different persona.

5.    Do you think it is dangerous?

Second life, to me, is only dangerous when you neglect your “real” life and submerge yourself in the alternate universe you have created. Attachment to such a fictional environment can, im my opinion, cause users to disregard the issue that who they meet may not actually be real. Submergence in the second life can lead users to forget who the avatar is and who they really are. 

6.    Do you think you could learn about things you are interested in?

Possibly. If I could take the time to figure out where to go to learn things.

7.    What did you think of the other avatars? Describe your interactions with them.

The other avatars were very extravagant. Because I was obviously new, other users were not keen on carrying on a conversation with me. Also, I struggled with finding a densely populated area. It almost seemed that I was chasing down people to try and to talk to them. Which may have seemed creepy.

8.    What are the advantages to SL?

I can allow an escape for people who struggle with human interaction, or have social issues. It can allow them to learn and explore while maybe anxiety may hold them back in the physical world. It could also work for those who feel that they are not satisfied with who they are and second life is a quick and easy alternative escape for them.

9.    What are the disadvantages?

1. Getting caught up in a virtual environment that does not truly exist.

2. Neglecting day to day responsibilities

3. Corrupting or substituting real relationships with virtual ones

4. Always carries a sense of skepticism as you explore. 

Jeffrey Gibson: Love Song

“Jamming things together over time, I guess, helped me invent my own bridges.”

–Jeffrey Gibson

Jeffrey Gibson strives to combine his own heritage with his modern influences. He uses colorful linear designs and portrays them on different mediums. These mediums originate from his tribal ancestry. Native American inspiration meets contemporary design. His minimalistic composition layers separately upon his mediums. The paint may lay on stretched animal hides, like the tribal djembe, but does not enforce the natural element of the hide. Gibson attempts to bridge the gap between contemporary art and native elements, but his art is just that. Layering one idea on top of another. Combining the eras that still stand separate from each other. Gibson embraces commonly used tribal elements and contorts or controls them to meet his idea of modern design. 

                  One of Jeffrey’s pieces allows the natural flow of the element to hang with the geometric shapes painted on it. A felt-like blanket is erected vertically to resemble the triangular patterns that are painted on it. Contrasting the forced forms of the hide canvases. The erected blanket allowed me to see that Gibson’s pieces do incorporate each other but do not merge. The colored pallet is just placed upon the canvas. When Jeffrey is striving to connect a contemporary idea or design to a functional tool, he does so only in that he places them together. He does not jeopardize one design for the other. This exhibition “bridges” the gap for Gibson, while simultaneously allowing the audience to see the direct distinction between the two ideas.

                  You can see Gibson’s contemporary influence commonly used in graphic design, typography backgrounds, architecture, etc. The merge between minimalistic-geometric lines and nature is a recent occurrence seen in digital design. The idea where linear meets nature can directly connect to technology integrating with art. Graphic designers are using geometric shapes and layering them on to natural photography (as seen below).Finding geometric design, in natural movement. Jeffrey Gibson’s physical mediums are very similar to graphic designs like these. Layering translucent shapes on top of natural elements. 

Birth-mark vs. Beauty-mark

Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Birth-mark” provides a 19^th century view on the merge of mind and machine, and how the two merge through emotional conflict.  When the main character Aylmer settles his studies and devotes his new life to his beautiful wife Georgiana, his strive for scientific perfection cannot be ignored. Aylmer, an alchemist is described to have submerged his life fully into a world of science, constantly combining elements with no reasonable explanation. He seems to be reaching for answers that don’t exist. So when he marries Georgiana, his psychological battle begins when he is no longer striving for answers in science.

            Hawthorne writes, “It was not unusual for the love of science to rival the love of a women in its depth and absorbing energy”. Aylmer believes the love of his wife can exceed the love of his work. Only when abandoning his work it shows that when submerged into such an infinite environment such as alchemy, that even love cannot divert the mind elsewhere.

The birthmark that lies upon Georgiana’s cheek was cherished and admired by her loved ones. She was taught to see the mark as a sign of beauty. Her view of this mark is changed when Aylmer describes it as an imperfection to her attractive face. As Aylmer dwells upon this mark, his subconscious brings him destructive dreams and a skewed perception of what actually lies upon Georgiana’s face. He is then convinced that he can remove the mark completely using science.  Aylmer finds an ecstasy in science that proves equal to or over comes his love for his wife.

            When Aylmer describes his thoughts on the mark, it alters Georgiana’s vision that this is no longer a beauty mark but is now a birthmark.  Aylmer disserted his science for Georgiana, only to return. His madness from her birthmark comes from a deeper subconscious relating to the abandonment of his work. He perceives the mark as a representation of the science that he had left behind. Retuning to his work and removing the mark was his gateway back to his first love.

            Aminadab, Aylmer’s assistant explains, “If she were my wife, I’d never part with that birthmark”. This reiterates how Aylmer is blinded by science, driven mad by striving for perfection, and over looks the beauty beneath the mark. Only when Aylmer is convinced the imperfection is connected to Georgiana’s soul, is when he searches for an opportunity to cheat nature.  His experiments have no rational outcome, but process is what fuels his work. Alchemistic goals have no finish line. They encourage combinations of incompatible elements to reach an unrealistic outcome. This practice precedes modern chemistry. When striving for an unreachable objective, ambition and focus can turn the mind unstable. As seen in “mad scientists” their devotion can become an obsession. Blinding the scientist of reality. Aylmer is an example of how first love cannot overcome a second. And when blinded for too long, it only takes time for beauty to subside to science. While for Aylmer, beauty lies in science, and imperfection is not an option.